Is Air America Going Broke?

According to the Radio Equalizer, Air America is so short of money that they are having problems paying their news bill to the Associated Press Network. AP Network is the most common news network you will hear on news breaks at radio stations nation wide.

Air America has tried to pretend that they have listeners, most often resulting in an did not place asterick during rating periods.

However what caught my attention is the wannabe Conservative who decided to start a blog calling on all Conservatives to jump off a cliff.

His address is "ilovebeingstupid" which is of course accurate since he is obviously a liberal. Liberals as we all know take pride in being stupid. They demand we worship at the alter of Darwin.

Since I have nothing to fear from any liberal, especially since they are reducing their chances at a Majority all the time, I dediced to mock him here, which is operating on the assumption that he is male, granted. So our limp wristed whiner doesn't like the Air America posts. Who really cares what a Liberal likes, in 20 years, California will be a Red State, and Liberals will be even more outragous and in your face with the hysteronics that they utilize so poorly.

Liberals admit they are praying for another 9-11

Wow, if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have believed the Nut Roots on the far left fringe of society had it in them. Ace of Spades gets the big nod on this one.

Russell Shaw, comments that those of us who support the War on Terror, or "George Bush's War on Terror" as the Libs call it, would change our minds if we were attacked.

What if another terror attack just before this fall's elections could save many thousand-times the lives lost?
I start from the premise that there is already a substantial portion of the electorate that tends to vote GOP because they feel that Bush has "kept us safe," and that the Republicans do a better job combating terrorism.
If an attack occurred just before the elections, I have to think that at least a few of the voters who persist in this "Bush has kept us safe" thinking would realize the fallacy they have been under.
If 5% of the "he's kept us safe" revise their thinking enough to vote Democrat, well, then, the Dems could recapture the House and the Senate and be in a position to:

Wow Russell, that is great, if only we get attacked again, then people might be willing to surrender on the war on Terror. Apparently Russell thinks he lives in Spain, after every attack, we get angry all over again, and if there was another attack, which by the way we do expect, we would demand blood, not President Bush's blood, but the IslamoFascists who are determined to slaughter us all. Of course, the Democratic Plan of cut and run

Oh wait, we tried surrender and it didn't work. Despite your short memory spell the section which states Be less inclined to launch foolish wars, absence of which would save thousands of soldiers' lives- and quite likely moderate the likelihood of further terror acts.

Yep, that is what the War on Terror is, a foolish war that only makes the threat of terror more likely. Tell me, what action precipitated 9-11? Or the USS Cole? Remember those events?

Russel, you are an godsend.I recognize that some will want to silence you, and unlike those very few I don't want you to change one little bit. I want you out there, telling people what you think, because an informed populace, informed on what nuts like you and the rest of the Liberal Loons in the Democratic Party really think and believe. The average citizen doesn't know what the Democrats really stand for. They don't believe us on the Right when we tell them what you say, so thankfully, you are out there blogging your heart out to make sure we all learn your true ideals and beliefs.

Give it twenty more years, and California will be a Red State too.

The Democrats are recruiting Seminar Callers

Those of you who have listened to Rush Limbaugh in the past know that he as well as other Radio Personalities have long had Liberals calling in trying to pretend to be Conservative and "fans" of the shows. These "Seminar" callers are recruited to call in and pretend to be Republicans who disagree with whatever the topic is today.

If you doubt that these Seminar callers exist, you are about to be educated.

From the Democratic Underground aka Dummies thread.


Call right wing radio, get the message out
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 02:15 AM by cooolandrew
It's great that we have air america but the knowledge that we do gain from these stations needs to be disseminated. My idea is to call all right wing shows and let the know the truths on economy, war and the aftermath of Katrina. Always best to make out that you are a right winger to get past the screeners. Just a suggestion but it might just work.Start the mantra 'Joe Lieberman is a loser.' If they can brainwash so can we.

Two responses are obviously stereotypical Liberal.


rodeodance (1000+ posts)
1. We need to come across with good arguments not just name calling or
mantras

cooolandrew (54 posts)
2. Yeah, but...
That is fine but we are talking about people who think with their fists first. They have been brought up on sound bites. It's ok if you are against mantras, good arguments are fine too. It just seems to me that the right are more prepared to listen to us via their radio show than by any other means. Strange but true.

OK, so they have no listeners on their Air America network. Frankly, more people tune in static on their radios than listen to Air America. If it wasn't for Conservatives with a taste for Schadenfreude Air America probably wouldn't have any listeners.

Now, these poor deluded nuts think they have to lie to get on the air with the "Right Wing Radio" shows. That would be the shows with listeners. Tell you what Libs, try calling in as a Liberal, and see what happens. I have listened to Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Neil Boortz and can tell you from my own listening experience that they LOVE Liberals who call in. You are put right on the air, and all of America, the Millions of listeners at home and on the road anxiously wait for you to make a complete ass of yourself.

Call in, explain what the Democratic Plan is to make us safer. So far, it's NOTHING. Explain how you would fight the War on Terror, of course we already know. Explain your plan for anything, on any subject, we look forward to it. You Libs have proposed NOTHING, NO Plan, you haven't proposed any legislation to address anything. All you want to do is complain that our programs to hunt terrorists are violating the rights of the poor downtrodden mass murdering lunatics.

Libs always plan on starting with a lie, because they have so much experience in lies that the truth is foreign territory for them. You see we aren't brainwashing other people, we are telling them the truth about things. I just got done converting a life long Liberal to Conservativism, it only took a year of slowly chipping away at his belief foundation and the truth set him free. He is now an educated free thinker, it wasn't brainwashing, it was breaking through the brain washing. Thankfully, you Liberals did all the hard work for me, as I move on to another target to convert to Conservative ideals. You liberals did all the hard work by basing your beliefs on lies, that means that once they start to see truth, fact over fiction, that the rest of it crumbles like a sand castle. Propaganda from the left will never win out over truth from the rest of us.

Conservative Ideals Work, time tested, and proven over the long run.

Update: There are more responses to the thread, and not one of the responses knows enough about the radio shows they hate to realize that Liberals who call in are put right to the front. Not one suggests telling the truth about who they are (kind of telling isn't it) or being honest.

Liberals Aborting their chances at a Majority

Despite what you may hear in polls or via pundits on the various media outlets, the truth is much easier to see.

As we all know, there are roughly 1 million abortions each year, and let's be honest, Liberals have more Abortions.

From an article in the Opinion Journal on the Democrats Fertility Gap.

....the data on young Americans tell a different story. Simply put, liberals have a big baby problem: They're not having enough of them, they haven't for a long time, and their pool of potential new voters is suffering as a result. According to the 2004 General Social Survey, if you picked 100 unrelated politically liberal adults at random, you would find that they had, between them, 147 children. If you picked 100 conservatives, you would find 208 kids. That's a "fertility gap" of 41%. Given that about 80% of people with an identifiable party preference grow up to vote the same way as their parents, this gap translates into lots more little Republicans than little Democrats to vote in future elections. Over the past 30 years this gap has not been below 20%--explaining, to a large extent, the current ineffectiveness of liberal youth voter campaigns today.

You see, Conservatives are breeding, and Liberals are Aborting, and that explains the continuation of the decline of the Liberal Movement. Parents teach children the values that they hold dear, the best Parents, mine included, explain why they believe what they do. Liberals also believe that the world is over populated, so they won't add to that over population, and are aborting their chances at a majority position.

A state that was split 50-50 between left and right in 2004 will tilt right by 2012, 54% to 46%. By 2020, it will be certifiably right-wing, 59% to 41%. A state that is currently 55-45 in favor of liberals (like California) will be 54-46 in favor of conservatives by 2020--and all for no other reason than babies.

Keep aborting those babies Libs, I for one don't want to deny you the right to choose to destroy your parties political future. I am one Conservative who whole heartedly encourages Liberals not to breed. Frankly, we have too many Liberal Loons on this planet, and am enjoying the idea of a dwindling Liberal Minority. In a hundred years, we may have to put Liberals into zoo's so our children can laugh at them and their antics there.

Asinine Crime Story from John Gibson

If you ever needed a story that just screamed "Stupid Crook News" then this is the one. A Lincoln Nebraska Man has been arrested 226 times. Arrested 226 times in 26 years no less.

Let me read from the Twin Cities Pioneer Press, dateline Lincoln, Nebraska:
"Kevin Holder's rap sheet is 43 pages long, dating back to 1980, and he just got another entry — his 226 arrest. Police say they caught him Sunday morning after a brief chase and found burglar tools in his possession. 'He's very well-known to Lincoln police officers,' Police Chief Tom Casady said."

Ok Friends, we have talked before about stupid crime prevention ideas, but the idea of arresting them, and then doing nothing isn't going to work.

You know, when you have been picked up a few times, let's say a hundred, then the idea that you are being persecuted unfairly should go out the window don't you think?

This is asinine, and I feel bad for Nebraska having to endure the national attention, however they did bring it on didn't they?

Liberal Lunacy, What if 9-11 never happened?

Hot Air handed this gem to us all today. In a series of articles from the nuts of the left wing, the loonies from the left wonder what would have happened if 9-11 never happened. There are several examples, but almost to a man, if you can call a liberal a man, the Liberals think that Kerry would have been President, and "America would be swimming in happiness".

We know what it would be like if Kerry or Gore was President, we know because we experienced Clinton as President during horrific Terrorist Attacks. For those of you who don't recognize the USS Cole, It was attacked by Islamic Terrorists, and President Clinton promosed a full Justice Department Investigation. In every attack, President Clinton proposed more FBI agents to help find and prosecute those responsible. The only time that President Clinton did decide Military Action was warranted by the Islamic Terrorists, was when Monica Lewinski testified before the Grand Jury for the second time.

Here is the problem friends, the Democrats always pretend to have a grand plan that will solve all the worlds problems, just trust them. Yet, when in power, they deliver higher taxes on the poor and elderly, more regulations to harm small business, and let's not forget inaction in the face of attacks on Americans. I happily quote Ann Coulter who said "In the past three decades, there have been more legitimate sightings of Big Foot than of "Scoop Jackson Democrats."

Half of Democrats think that America is not a good country, according to the Rasmussen Poll. Gee Democrat love America, yeah right.

Smile crooks, your on Crime Watch Camera

Those of you old enough remember those shows of yester year like Candid Camera. With today's web cams, and internet streaming video, it's obviously much easier to get candid shots of life in the big city, but does it help?

In a Washington Post article, the question is asked, and the answer appears to be probably not. What would end the crime spree that Washington D.C. has endured this year? What would end the rising activity of today's criminals? I posted once on juvenile crime and the dis-service that we in society are guilty of in that situation.

I say we are also not doing our jobs by limiting and creating a society of victims in our cities. We create that society by denying our citizens the right to defend themselves. We decide it is honorable to assist someone in a time of need. We pass "Good Samaritan" laws to protect those who want to help someone during an emergency, like an automobile accident, but inadvertently injure the victim. They meant well is the way it is explained to us all. Yet, we don't pass laws protecting the person who is reacting to violent crime. We hold the home owner liable if the criminal is injured while violating the law. We hold the crime victim liable to criminal and civil action if they resist successfully. The criminal was injured in the act of doing the crime, and it's the victims fault because he or she didn't do the proper thing and act like a sheep.

We don't need cameras on every street corner to stop crime, we need a population that is able and justified in defending itself. A population encouraged to defend itself and knowing that the criminal is wrong would end much of the various crime spree out there, yet we don't do the obvious and time tested answer. Instead we pretend that those ways don't work, and insist that the population is safer with non violent community outreach programs.

Where is the Greatest Generation

On December 8, 1941, one lone voice voted against the war with Japan. Today, a whole political party is opposed to the war against terror.

What happened to the political opposition? Why didn't the Republicans use every set back during the war to gain political points? Everyone tried to remember Pearl Harbor, and the sneak attack. Remember Pearl Harbor was the cry through the war. No one screamed that Germans had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, we were determined to destroy all enemies, no matter if they personally participated in the attack or not. We didn't limit our vengeance on the Japanese Navy, nor the Japanesee Air Forces. Why are we told that the images of 9-11 are harmful?

My friends, I have been considering this for the past two weeks, trying to understand what happened to our national determination, what happened to our world determination. I have some answers, but not good ones. Perhaps it takes someone of greater skill than I have.

First, the success of the Soviet Efforts to infiltrate the anti-war movement of the Viet Nam era. This created the foundation of the Socialist movement that suffered greatly under the Presidency of Ronald Reagan. Yet, it wasn't destroyed, it still existed, and even grew somewhat. The ability of those socialists to fool the ill informed and uninformed is not to be underestimated. Truth goes out the window when the rabid leftists begin their debate, and with an absence of someone to advocate the truth to the lies means that the propaganda wins.

Second. The press in WW II was unapologetically Pro American, and pro victory. The Press would hold stories that might harm American interests and efforts. Today, the Press consistently harms those efforts.

Third is the people in our modern era who have become accustomed to immediate gratification, and lack the fortitude to strive for years towards a goal. Daily life was much more difficult in WW II and the preceding years, so our people were more accustomed to long term struggles, waking daily and only seeing more struggle.

Finally, the ascendancy of the Liberal Movement in the Democratic Party. Prior to WW II the Republican Party was isolationism, much as Pat Buchanan is today, yet after Pearl Harbor, the Republicans placed political idealism on the back burner in favor of political need. Today's Democrats don't place political idealism behind anything. The patently socialist idealism is patently behind every position and every argument.

These blatantly anti American positions are defended by the media as "patriotic" disagreements. If your position doesn't help your nation, how do you call it Patriotic? The Liberals do, and the press loves to agree. The Liberals and Press constantly use lies to demonize patriotic and determined people as fools.

The result of all these contributing factors is a nation staggering under the weight of the lies of the left and which stands to lose a war more dangerous than the Second World War. If America had lost to Japan, Indonesia would have been Japanese, and the Far East would have been part and parcel of a Japanese empire. Europe would have been Nazi controlled, and eventually Germany and the Soviet Union would have carved up Eastern Europe between them.

Today, the threat is global, our cities are at risk constantly, and will be attacked eventually. The Terrorists act alone, or as part of small cells which attack without warning. We can't blame a nation for these attacks, so we try and pretend they are isolated incidents.

We lie to each other about the risks, and pretend that if we try, we can get along with those who wish our destruction.

There was no desire to get along with Germany, or Japan, or Italy after the attacks on Pearl Harbor.

We were a nation united against an enemy, demonstrating the strength of an enraged Democracy, dedicated towards one ideal, victory.

We were at our best, dedicated to a goal. We were reminded by the media, and our Government of the attack that started that war, instead of burying the images of the attacks that started this one.

It is an obvious difference in our approach to the reality of the world life. We can't afford to lose, but the Democrats insist that we can't win. To the leftists, victory isn't an option, it denys them the political power they crave at whatever cost. Nothing is too high a cost for the Socialist to place before the alter of leftist idealism.